Copacetic

Ace King, check it out!

InterTradeIreland – Private Equity Conference – John Cavill – Growth Entrepreneurship

with one comment

John Cavill, Chairman, Intermezzo Ventures

Setup a local area networking company (Logical Networks). What was good about our company? Why was it successful. 3i funded. Imported technology from US.  Within three months 3i had invested in three other companies in the same space. One company had gone bankrupt, bought all support people BMW 5 series. Second company, founders fell out with each other.  Third company struggled for first year, then developed some different software that was quite successful.

Finally there was our company. CAG 55%. What was the difference?  Team builds success, lone entrepreneur is a myth. 

Want to understand what makes a good team? Went to Henley to do doctoral research.

What research has been done around the world regarding what makes a successful team?

  • The VC industry
  • Entrepreneurial Capital
  • New aspects of entrepreneurial research

The VC’s Dilemma

“The process of picking winners continue to challenge, baffle and mystify even the most experienced investors. Certain winners somehow fail; apparent losers sometimes win”. (Smilor 1997).

VCs have moved to investing larger sums of money in smaller numbers of businesses. Equity gap between bottom end VC investment (2m) and the emerging companies requiring less than that. Business Angels are starting to fill that gap.

VC Performance

15-20% will be blockbusters

23-35% will be winners

20-30% will break even

15-25% will fail (Laurie 2001).

Why do businesses fail?

Of every 100 businesses that fail, 92 will fail due to bad management, 8 will fail due to acts of God.

Management is the key driver of success? Failures: 69% failure of management, 17% external shocks, 14% flawed business model.

Lens Model: Entrepreneur/Team, Product Service, Market, Financial (business model, capital structure).

VC Human Capital Evaluation

Airline Captains – Systematic data collection/analysis

Art Critics – Snap judgement

Sponges – Soak up data non systematically

Infiltrators – Become quasi management

Prosecutors – Aggressively question management

Suitors – Woo management

Terminators – impossible to achieve – can’t measure

69% of types fall into first three.

IRR .8, .25, .20 for first three.

Usage rates : 13%, 30%, 26%

Attributes of Entrepreneurs

Entrepreneurs like pornography

creativity innovation vs general management skills, business know how, networks

Bottom left : Promoter, Bottom right: Manager administrator, Top right: Inventor, Top Left: Entrepreneur

Many different definitions of Entrepreneur.

Gazelles and Mice. Gazelles, consistent growth of 20% a year for 4 years. Mice, learnt to survive, work hard to feed themselves, remain stable in size and are comfortable with their status.

Only 3% of Entrepreneurial businesses are Gazelles. Drop off of Gazelle status is dramatic over the next three years.

Enterprising person – Create a small or micro business

Entrepreneur – Create a significant business

The growth entrepreneur – Create a sustained high growth business

Move from founder to leader.

New group : The Ultrapreneur, create a hypergrowth business, growth rates of 50% to 500% a year.

Entrepreneurial Attributes:

  • Need for achievement
  • Internal Locus of control – I control my destiny
  • Risk taking
  • Tolerance of ambiguity
  • Creativity/Innovativeness
  • Need for autonomy
  • Self Confidence
  • High energy levels

Entrepreneurial Team Dynamics:

  • Age
  • Gender
  • Educational background
  • Parent(s) entrepreneurs
  • Prior work experience
  • Prior joint work experience (worked together in mgmt team before)
  • Prior startup experience
  • Balance of operational skills
  • Established networks

Largest number of variables are in the team and the lead entrepreneur.

Todays workforce is being judged by a new yardstick..not just by how smart we are, or by our training and expertise, but also how we handle ourselves with each other.  (EQ)

Success profiles are dominated by High EQ individuals. Failing profiles are driven by low EQ.

Experience + EQ is the key determinant of success.

Left brain vs Right brain. Right brain individuals tend to be entrepreneurs.

Big list, all dyslexic. Jobs, Churchill, Rockefeller, Patton, Branson, Ford, Einstein, Newton.

During a hurricane even turkeys can fly.

www.enterprisehubnetwork.co.uk

DNA link to entrepreneur ship, identical twins study.

High testosterone, more likely to be entrepreneurial. 

Business plan in one hand, urine sample in the other.

Written by Joe

March 13, 2007 at 5:38 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Very interesting stats.

    Were these from John’s research (thesis?) or a ‘cookbook’ style from his own experience?

    some of those lines I’ve seen b4 but not in that collection.

    Lal

    March 22, 2007 at 4:44 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: