The next OnDemand Service – User Account Management

PutPlace.com is launching real soon now and of course like everybody else on the planet we rolled our own user account management (UAM) system (you know, registration, login, logout, forgot password, change username etc. etc.). Needless to say we used a Framework (in our case Django) but why do I need to reinvent this wheel?

We get our storage from Amazon (and soon our Grid). Our O/S is a flavour of Linux,  our Database is Postgres, we use surveymonkey for surveys and mailchimp (what is it with the simian metaphor?) for mail campaigns, why can’t I pay somebody on a per user basis to manage my user accounts?

What would this service look like? Well pretty much like a credit card payment interface looks like on the web today but with the following features.

  •  a bunch of REST endpoints for all the standard UAM functions
    • Register
    • Login
    • Logout
    • Enable User
    • Disable User
    • Set Session Timeout
    • etc.
  • Support for session management
  • Standard reporting (who, when, from where, how long)
  • Support for OpenID
  • Java, Python, Ruby and .NET APIs (Rails and Django integration for extra points)
  • Global deployment with appropriate SLAs
  • Deployment pages with a proper branding kit so people can get up and running quickly
  • Ability to extract all my users in .csv format or via an API

I would pay for this service in chunks of hundreds to 1000s of users with all the usual discounting policy for prepayment or purchasing in bulk and the first 50 users are free.

One more pain point on the road to release removed.

I don’t want a free one with strings attached (e.g. LiveID) and I don’t want some non-profit consortium (e.g. the Liberty Alliance). I want to pay  for it and own my data.

Basically a Web 2.0 oriented OnDemand business.

5 thoughts on “The next OnDemand Service – User Account Management

  1. Joe,

    We’re looking a similar problem – I think google is offering a similar service.

    It’s ‘free’ at the moment (and agree that this is a problem as you’d rather pay and get a quality service), but google is moving to ‘premium’ version of it’s apps, so you may get what you want in the near future.

    Paul

    Like

  2. I was thinking the same thing last week. An important feature is the signed SSL cert – when all of our sites are authenticating from one domain, only 1 signed SSL cert is needed.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.